High Ambition Coalition for Nature and People. 50 Countries Announce Bold Commitment to Protect at Least 30% of the World’s Land and Ocean by 2030 (Campaign for Nature, 2021).
Waldron A. et al. Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature: Costs, Benefits and Economic Implications (Campaign for Nature, 2020).
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23223 (2019).
Nelson, A. & Chomitz, K. M. Protected Area Effectiveness in Reducing Tropical Deforestation (The World Bank, 2009).
Scharlemann, J. P. W. et al. Securing tropical forest carbon: the contribution of protected areas to REDD. Oryx 44, 352–357 (2010).
Feng, Y. et al. Assessing the effectiveness of global protected areas based on the difference in differences model. Ecol. Indic. 130, 108078 (2021).
Laurance, W. F. et al. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: A 32-year investigation. Biol. Conserv. 144, 56–67 (2011).
Laurance, W. F. et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, 290–294 (2012).
Terraube, J., Van doninck, J., Helle, P. & Cabeza, M. Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2957 (2020).
Barnes, M. D. et al. Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size. Nat. Commun. 7, 12747 (2016).
Amano, T. et al. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature 553, 199–202 (2018).
Kleijn, D., Cherkaoui, I., Goedhart, P. W., van der Hout, J. & Lammertsma, D. Waterbirds increase more rapidly in Ramsar-designated wetlands than in unprotected wetlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 289–298 (2014).
Reyes-Arriagada, R. et al. Population trends of a mixed-species colony of Humboldt and Magellanic Penguins in Southern Chile after establishing a protected area. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 8, 13 (2013).
Bukart, K. Motion 101 passes at IUCN, calls for protecting 50% of Earth’s lands and seas. One Earth https://www.oneearth.org/motion-101-passes-at-iucn-calls-for-protecting-50-of-earths-lands-and-seas/ (2021).
Protected Planet Report 2020 (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2021).
Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).
Barnes, M. D., Glew, L., Wyborn, C. & Craigie, I. D. Prevent perverse outcomes from global protected area policy. Nat, Ecol. Evol. 2, 759–762 (2018).
Pressey, R. L., Cabeza, M., Watts, M. E., Cowling, R. M. & Wilson, K. A. Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 583–592 (2007).
Geldmann, J. et al. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biol. Conserv. 161, 230–238 (2013).
Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Cazalis, V. The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness. Nat. Commun. 11, 5147 (2020).
Redford, K. H. The empty forest. BioScience 42, 412–422 (1992).
Ferraro, P. J. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. N. Direct. Eval. 2009, 75–84 (2009).
Adams, V. M., Barnes, M. & Pressey, R. L. Shortfalls in conservation evidence: moving from ecological effects of interventions to policy evaluation. One Earth 1, 62–75 (2019).
Wauchope, H. S. et al. Evaluating impact using time-series data. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 196–205 (2021).
Kingsford, R. T., Roshier, D. A. & Porter, J. L. Australian waterbirds time and space travellers in dynamic desert landscapes. Mar. Freshw. Res. 61, 875–884 (2010).
The Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Managing Ramsar Sites. ramsar.org https://www.ramsar.org/sites-countries/managing-ramsar-sites (2014).
European Commission. The Birds Directive. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/birdsdirective/index_en.htm (accessed 3 April 2022).
Zhang, W., Sheldon, B. C., Grenyer, R. & Gaston, K. J. Habitat change and biased sampling influence estimation of diversity trends. Curr. Biol. 31, 3656–3662.e3 (2021).
Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. & da Fonseca, G. A. B. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291, 125–128 (2001).
Carranza, T., Balmford, A., Kapos, V. & Manica, A. Protected area effectiveness in reducing conversion in a rapidly vanishing ecosystem: the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv. Lett. 7, 216–223 (2014).
Rabinowitz, D. In The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation (ed. Synge, H.) 205–217 (John Wiley & Sons, 1981).
Daskalova, G. N., Myers-Smith, I. H. & Godlee, J. L. Rare and common vertebrates span a wide spectrum of population trends. Nat. Commun. 11, 4394 (2020).
Hettiarachchi, M., Morrison, T. H. & McAlpine, C. Forty-three years of Ramsar and urban wetlands. Glob. Environ. Change 32, 57–66 (2015).
Munishi, P., Chuwa, J., Kilungu, H., Moe, S. & Temu, R. Management effectiveness and conservation initiatives in the Kilombero Valley Flood Plains Ramsar Site, Tanzania. Tanzania J. For. Nat. Conserv. 81, 1–10 (2012).
Fahrig, L. Why do several small patches hold more species than few large patches? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 615–628 (2020).
Newmark, W. D. Extinction of mammal populations in western North American National Parks. Conserv. Biol. 9, 512–526 (1995).
Mascia, M. B. & Pailler, S. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 4, 9–20 (2011).
Di Marco, M. et al. Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 32–42 (2017).
Wetlands International. Asian Waterbird Census. https://south-asia.wetlands.org/our-approach/healthy-wetland-nature/asian-waterbird-census/ (accessed 3 April 2022).
Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).
Geldmann, J. et al. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12434 (2018).
Kingsford, R. T., Bino, G. & Porter, J. L. Continental impacts of water development on waterbirds, contrasting two Australian river basins: global implications for sustainable water use. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4958–4969 (2017).
Jia, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Cao, L. & Fox, A. D. Drivers of waterbird communities and their declines on Yangtze River floodplain lakes. Biol. Conserv. 218, 240–246 (2018).
Lehikoinen, A., Rintala, J., Lammi, E. & Pöysä, H. Habitat-specific population trajectories in boreal waterbirds: alarming trends and bioindicators for wetlands. Animal Conserv. 19, 88–95 (2016).
Boyd, C. et al. Spatial scale and the conservation of threatened species. Conserv. Lett. 1, 37–43 (2008).
Schleicher, J. et al. Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1094–1096 (2019).
Wauchope, H. et al. Quantifying the impact of protected areas on near-global waterbird population trends, a pre-analysis plan. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27741v2 (2019).
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C. & Mellor, D. T. The preregistration revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2600–2606 (2018).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
QGIS Geographic Information System (QGIS, 2021).
Hadley Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Springer, 2002).
The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)/The Global Database on Protected Areas Management Effectiveness (GD-PAME) www.protectedplanet.net (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2019).
Global Self-consistent, Hierarchical, High-resolution Geography Database (GSHHG) (NOAA, 2017).
Coetzer, K. L., Witkowski, E. T. F. & Erasmus, B. F. N. Reviewing Biosphere Reserves globally: effective conservation action or bureaucratic label? Biol. Rev. 89, 82–104 (2014).
Ament, J. M. & Cumming, G. S. Scale dependency in effectiveness, isolation, and social-ecological spillover of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 30, 846–855 (2016).
Naimi, B., Hamm, N. A. S., Groen, T. A., Skidmore, A. K. & Toxopeus, A. G. Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37, 191–203 (2014).
Salmerón Gómez, R., García, Pérez, J., López Martín, M. D. M. & García, C. G. Collinearity diagnostic applied in ridge estimation through the variance inflation factor. J. Appl. Stat. 43, 1831–1849 (2016).
Gu, X. S. & Rosenbaum, P. R. Comparison of multivariate matching methods: structures, distances, and algorithms. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 2, 405–420 (1993).
Stuart, E. A. Matching methods for causal inference: a review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. 25, 1–21 (2010).
King, G. & Nielsen, R. Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Pol. Anal. 27, 435–454 (2019).
Rosenbaum, P. R. DOS: design of observational studies. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DOS/index.html (2018).
Linden, A. A matching framework to improve causal inference in interrupted time-series analysis. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 24, 408–415 (2018).
Simmons, B. I., Hoeppke, C. & Sutherland, W. J. Beware greedy algorithms. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 804–807 (2019).
Austin, P. C. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat. Med. 28, 3083–3107 (2009).
Rubin, D. B. Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 2, 169–188 (2001).
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression (Sage, 2019).
Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/index.html (2021).
Zeileis, A. & Hothorn, T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2, 7–10 (2002).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 48 (2015).
Christensen, R. Ordinal–regression models for ordinal data. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ordinal/index.html (2019).
Lüdecke, D. ggeffects: tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J. Op. Source Softw. 3, 772 (2018).
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J. & Conover, W. J. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21, 239–245 (1979).
Carnell, R. lhs: latin hypercube samples. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lhs/index.html (2020).
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).
Lu, C. & Tian, H. Global nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer use for agriculture production in the past half century: Shifted hot spots and nutrient imbalance. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 181–192 (2017).
Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4, e8273 (2009).
Hurtt, G. C. et al. Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500-2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands. Clim. Change 109, 117–161 (2011).
Lloyd, C. T., Sorichetta, A. & Tatem, A. J. High resolution global gridded data for use in population studies. Sci. Data 4, 17001 (2017).
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N. & Belward, A. S. High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540, 418–422 (2016).
Sandvik, B. World Borders Dataset. Thematic Mapping http://thematicmapping.org/downloads/world_borders.php (2009).
BirdLife International. Species Distribution Data Download http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/spcdownload (accessed 25 February 2020).
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).
WWF International. Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/mett2_final_version_july_2007.pdf (2007).